New Jersey Association of Justice
American Bar Association
National Employers Lawyers Association

What is a Wrongful Termination?

What is a Wrongful Termination?The term “wrongful termination” is used to describe the situation in which an employer terminates an employee in violation of federal, state, local and/or common law. There are many ways in which an employer can violate federal, state, local or common law in making the decision to terminate an employee from his or her employment. Examples can include a discriminatory discharge, retaliatory discharge, unlawful harassment, breach of contract and breach of employee handbook or manual.

Discriminatory Discharge

An employer who terminates an employee for discriminatory reasons can be held liable for the wrongful or unlawful termination. New Jersey’s Law Against Discrimination (“LAD”), considered one of the strongest and most protective discrimination laws in the entire country, prohibits employment discrimination against individuals based on protected traits, such as sex, sexual orientation, age, race, national origin, disability, familial status, pregnancy and others. This means that if an employer terminates an employee because of their inclusion in a protected class, an employee may have a claim for wrongful termination. Examples of discriminatory discharges include actions such as terminating an employee because they need to take a disability leave, terminating a group of older workers to replace them with younger employees or firing an employee because she is pregnant.

Retaliatory Discharge

Employees who are terminated for making a reasonable and good faith complaint of discrimination or other unlawful activity, or participating in a workplace investigation, may have a claim of wrongful termination. New Jersey law has several anti-retaliation statutes, including the Law Against Discrimination, Equal Pay Act and the Conscientious Employee Protection Act. If an employee engages in protected activity under an anti-retaliation law, an employer cannot terminate his or her employment in retaliation for engaging in the protected activity. Examples of a retaliatory discharge include terminating an employee for taking a protected medical leave, complaining about OSHA violations, firing an employee because they complain about sexual harassment or terminating an employee because he or she filed a claim for workers compensation benefits.

Unlawful Harassment

An employee whose employment is terminated because of unlawful harassment may have a claim of wrongful or unlawful termination. Employers have a legal obligation to provide a safe work environment free of discrimination. This obligation includes having effective anti-discrimination and anti-harassment policies in place that are well-publicized and include mandatory training to its managers. Complaints of discrimination must be investigated promptly and thoroughly by an employer. When employers allow employees to work in a hostile work environment, they can be found liable for the damage their negligence causes to the victim. If an employee is constructively discharged, which occurs when an employee is forced to resign because of the continuing and intolerable hostile work environment that is causing emotional or physical distress because the work environment, an employer can be held liable for wrongful termination or unlawful termination.

Breach of Contract

Breaching an employment agreement by terminating an employee can be considered a wrongful or unlawful termination. Breach of contract claims in the employment context are not as common as other employment termination cases because most employees are employed in an “at-will” basis.

If an employee has an employment contract that provides for a term of employment, an employer may not terminate the employee prior to the expiration of the term unless the contract provides for it to do so under express circumstances as set forth in the contract. Typically, a term employment contract contains a “for cause” or “for just cause” termination provision which allows an employer to terminate the employment contract if certain events occur. Typical “for cause” reasons allowing an employer to terminate an employment agreement include the employee committing a felony, permanent disability, gross negligence, insubordination and death. A termination based upon a “for cause” reasons must be based upon facts that are (1) supported by substantial evidence; (2) reasonably believed by the employer to be true and (2) not for arbitrary, capricious or illegal reasons.”

Breach of Employment Policy

Terminating an employee in violation of an internal employment policy could also give rise to a claim of wrongful or unlawful termination. In certain circumstances, representations made by an employer in employment handbooks can constitute a unilateral contract of job protections and job benefits. The determination of whether an employment policy or manual can be enforceable will depend on the meaning and effect and the circumstances under which the policy was prepared and distributed. Most of the time, an employment manual or handbook will contain language that states nothing in the employee manual or handbook shall be construed as creating a contract and that the employment is at-will. This language, commonly referred to as a “Wooley disclaimer” protects an employer from creating any contractual obligation to their employees that is necessary to support a claim of wrongful or unlawful termination.

DISCLAIMER: The information you obtain at this site is not, nor is it intended to be, legal advice. You should consult an attorney for individual advice regarding your own situation.
Client Reviews
We had a wrongful termination issue combined with a denial of unemployment insurance. Chris Eibeler was our primary attorney. His partner Bob Smith also consulted and gave us good advice. They were both so kind, caring, and professional. They guided us though a very tough time and a positive outcome versus a prior employer. They were also able to reverse our denial of unemployment insurance. I cannot recommend Smith and Eibeler highly enough. The entire staff is very professional, personable, and caring. Tom Wilson
I went to Smith Eibeler LLC for a last minute unemployment matter. Chris, Diane and his staff were very professional and easy to talk to. They provided knowledgeable insight and also kept me in the loop with the what was happening. I would not hesitate to go to him again. John Jung
Chris Eibeler (and the whole team) is very knowledgeable in all aspects of employment/unemployment here in NJ. They break down the most difficult aspects of the law, which allows you to conceptualize and better understand the complexities of the NJ Labor & Employment system. Smith Eibeler should be your first call regarding any Employment, workforce, or Labor questions here in New Jersey. I highly recommend them. Brian Allen
I approached Chris Eibeler regarding an unemployment case in early 2016. Him and his staff are some of the most professional people I have ever dealt with. The process took a while, but his approach to hard questioning helped me win my case. He knows how to get the job done and I am glad I went to him. I would recommend him to anyone in the future who asks for a lawyer. Thank you Chris! Tim F.
I highly recommend the office of Smith Eibeler for employment related issues, particularly anything related to restrictive covenants or post-employment contracts. I found Smith Eibeler via the web and cannot believe how fortunate I am to have found them. My case was handled by Bob Smith who represented me in a potential lawsuit by my former employer for violation of a post-employment contract (not a restrictive covenant per se). Bob was professional, friendly, understanding, and above all extremely helpful. Bob helped me avoid a lawsuit and was extremely knowledgeable in this field. I was thoroughly impressed with his prowess. Hopefully I will never have a legal issue related to employment again, but if I do, I will not hesitate to retain Smith Eibeler again! Gavin Tully

Results may vary depending on your particular facts and legal circumstances.